Original link
NAPOLITANO: What if government rejects the Constitution?
Frightening questions prompt unwelcome visions of America
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Thursday, April 12, 2012
What if the government never took the Constitution
seriously? What if the same generation - in some cases, the same individuals -
who wrote in the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the
freedom of speech,” also enacted the Alien and Sedition Acts, which made it a
crime to criticize the government? What if the feds don’t regard the
Constitution as the supreme law of the land?
What if the government regards the Constitution as merely a guideline to be
referred to from time to time, or a myth to be foisted upon the voters, but not
as a historic delegation of power that lawfully limits the federal government?
What if Congress knows that most of what it regulates puts it outside the
confines of the Constitution, but it does whatever it can get away with? What if
the feds don’t think that the Constitution was written to keep them off the
people’s backs?
What if there’s no substantial difference between the two major political
parties? What if the same political mentality that gave us the Patriot Act, with
its federal-agent-written search warrants that permit unconstitutional spying on
us, also gave us Obamacare, with its mandate to buy health insurance, even if we
don’t want or need it? What if both political parties love power more than
freedom? What if both parties have used the Commerce Clause in the Constitution
to stretch the power of the federal government far beyond its constitutionally
ordained boundaries and well beyond the plain meaning of words?
What if both parties love war because the public is more docile during war and
permits higher taxes and more federal theft of freedom from individuals and
power from the states? What if none of these recent wars has made us freer or
safer, but just poorer?
What if Congress bribed the states with cash in return for their enacting
legislation that Congress likes but cannot lawfully enact? What if Congress went
to all the states in the union and offered them cash to re-pave their interstate
highways if the states only lowered their speed limits? What if the states took
that deal? What if the Supreme Court approved this bribery and then Congress did
it again and again? What if this bribery were a way for Congress to get around
the few constitutional limitations that Congress acknowledges?
What if Congress believes that it can spend tax dollars on anything it pleases
and tie any strings it wants to that spending? What if Congress uses its taxing
and spending power to regulate anything it wants to control, whether authorized
by the Constitution or not? What if anyone other than members of Congress
offered state legislatures cash in return for favorable legislation? What if
Congress wrote laws that let it break laws that ordinary people would be
prosecuted for breaking?
What if the Declaration of Independence says that the government derives its
powers from the consent of the governed? What if the government claims to derive
powers from some other source that it will not - because it cannot - name? What
if we never gave the government the power to spy on us, to print worthless cash,
to kill in our names, to force us to buy health insurance or to waste our money
by telling us that exercise is good and sugar is bad?
What if we never gave the government the power to bribe the poor with welfare or
the middle class with tax breaks or the rich with bailouts or the states with
cash? What if we don’t consent to what has become of the government? What if the
Constitution has been tacitly amended by the consent of both political parties
whereby instead of ratifying amendments, all three branches of government merely
look the other way when the government violates the Constitution? What if the
president cannot constitutionally bomb whatever country he wants? What if the
Congress cannot constitutionally exempt its members from the laws that govern
the rest of us? What if the courts cannot constitutionally invent a right to
kill babies in the womb?
What if the federal government is out of control, no matter which party tries to
control it? What if there is only harmony on Capitol Hill when government is
growing and personal liberty is shrinking? What if the presidential race this
fall will not be between good and evil, between right and left, between free
markets and central planning or even between constitutional government and big
government, but only about how much bigger big government should get?
What if enough is enough? What do we do about it? What if it’s too late?
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the
senior judicial analyst on the Fox News Channel. He is author of “It Is
Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal
Freedom” (Thomas Nelson, 2011).
|