|
|
|

Your Tax
Deductible
Donations
Keep Our WorkMoving Forward |
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

USCOA DC
Circuit Case # 05-5395 |
|
 |
|
The Lawsuit To
Restore
Constitutional Order |
|
The
Landmark
Right-to-Petition
Lawsuit Information
Center
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In July 2004, almost 1800
Citizens initiated a landmark federal lawsuit
to have the Judiciary declare
-- for the first time in US history
--
the full constitutional
meaning of the
First Amendment Petition clause.
The
Right to Petition:
The profound constitutional tool
to
peacefully enforce & restore
the Constitution & Bill of Rights
|
|
CURRENT STATUS:
The U.S. Supreme Court refused
to hear the appeal letting stand the decision from
the USDC (in DC) claiming the Government has NO
obligation to respond to the People.
(January, 2008)
|
| |
LEARN MORE
about the
"Capstone Right" that is the direct exercise of
Popular Sovereignty
&
access the court documents,
news updates, law review research, historical documents, etc.
|
|
|
“If money is wanted by Rulers
who have in any manner
oppressed the People,
they may retain it
until their grievances
are redressed,
and thus peaceably
procure relief,
without trusting to
despised petitions
or disturbing
the public tranquility.”
Journals of the Continental Congress,
1:105-113
From an 8-page official Act passed unanimously by the
Founders in 1774
|
|
"Congress shall make no
law...abridging
...the right of the people...to petition
the Government for
a redress of grievances."
Join us as we
claim & exercise
our Right of Popular Sovereignty
and our Right to government Accountability
Answers.
Accountability.
Redress. Liberty. |
|
|
The Latest Foundation
News
Archives
RTP Lawsuit Updates
|
| |
| |
|
NCEL National
Clean Elections Lawsuit info here!
|
|
Access the "6700"
lawsuit
documents here!
|
| |
July 18,
2008
TRUST: The Plan Depends On It
Bob Schulz Coming To A Theater Near You?
WTP’s Plan to Restore Constitutional Order is on
track, but running behind schedule.
By now, the Petitions for Redress should
have been delivered to every member of Congress and
we should have been able to proudly proclaim,
“Congress has been served!”
Unfortunately, we're not quite there yet.
To begin with, we timely mailed 1219 sets of
Petition packages to over 700 people who volunteered
to serve 535 members of Congress in their district
offices on
June 30, 2008, and to return to us a notarized proof of
service.
By July 3rd and again after the
July 4th weekend we had received and were
processing hundreds of returns from volunteers who
had successfully completed service. However, by July
10th it was apparent that 129 of the 535
members of Congress had still not been served!
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Update
|
June 25,
2008
"PUBLICITY BOMB:" More Tools
Three days ago we called upon our supporters to help ignite a
"publicity
bomb" regarding next week's historical service
of legal
Notice and Demand upon every member of Congress
regarding several First Amendment Petitions for
Redress
of Grievances. We are pleased to announce that a
number of newspapers have already published the
suggested "Letter to the Editor."
We are making the following items available to further assist
you in
interacting with the media:
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Update
|
| June 22,
2008
NEXT: "PUBLICITY BOMB"
HERE: FREE AND EASY TOOL
June 30, 2008 may go down in history as the day Americans
began, in earnest,
the moral and solemn process of holding their
Government accountable to the Constitution by
directly exercising their unalienable and individual
Right of
Redress, rather than depending upon the will of the
majority of votes as cast
in local precincts, the halls of Congress or the
inner chambers of our
courthouses.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Update
|
June 18,
2008
NEEDED: A FEW MORE SERVERS
NEEDED: A FEW LESS "DUPLICATES"
NEEDED: A FEW MORE $$'s
Click Here To Access the Update
|
June 14,
2008
Ron Paul Ends His Campaign
“It’s Up To The People To Save The
Constitution”

In announcing the end to his campaign for
political office last Thursday,
Ron Paul called upon the People to do something that
really makes a difference
in the fight for freedom, to give the establishment
the fight of its life, to save the country.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Update
|
June 12,
2008
CONVENTION SHOW STOPPER!
Ron Paul: "Government Must Respond
To Petitions for Redress"

Can the GOP delegates nominate a
Presidential candidate who openly defies
the Constitution?
(continued...)
Click Here To Access this
Important Update
|
| June 8,
2008
GOING VIRAL: TIME
IS SHORT

It
is no secret that Ron Paul's campaign for President
with his message of
Freedom has resonated with many
People, piqued their interest in the
Constitution
and demonstrated that the way our system of
governance
is working is in sharp contrast to the
way it was designed to work.
Despite
this organization's prior efforts involving the production
and promotion of Aaron Russo's film documentary, "America
Freedom to Fascism" (which featured both Ron Paul and the
work of the We The People Foundation for Constitutional
Education, Inc.), many of these new Sons of Liberty do not
-- as yet -- know
much about the WTP organization and our
profound plan to restore
Constitutional Order.
Click Here To Access:
GOING VIRAL: TIME IS SHORT
Click Here To Access:
GOING VIRAL: Ron Paul "Meetup"
Groups
|
May 30, 2008
Open Letter To: Jacob Hornberger
(Future of Freedom Foundation, “FFF”) and
Anthony Romero (American Civil Liberties Union,
“ACLU”)

Click Here To Access this
Important Update
|
| May 25, 2008
Taking the Revolution to YouTube &
Google:
The Profound Plan For Freedom
he profound Plan put forth by WTP to
continue Ron Paul’s peaceful Revolution through
civic action has now been posted as a video on
YouTube.com and Google Video.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access this
Important Update
|
May 22,
2008
The Cure For Ron Paul's Issues:
A Profound Plan For Freedom
This message is for all people who support
Ron Paul's message of Freedom and want to know what
they can do as a "Freedom Keeper."
Listed just below are seven activities of
the federal government that are
un-constitutional.
With the exception of Ron Paul, all of this year's
presidential candidates, past and present, would
have us believe these activities are mere matters of
public policy.
Ron Paul says "NO!" -- These are not matters of
public policy, they are
VIOLATIONS of the Constitution.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access this
Important Update
|
May 17,
2008
"People should not
be afraid of their governments,
governments should be afraid of their People"
Freedom Requires
Bravery
Historic WTP "V for Vendetta" Poster Now Available
Click Here To Access the Full Update
Click here to make a
donation
to receive the historic poster.

|
May 8,
2008
"Judge's order stifles a basic right"
Newspaper’s editorial board supports WTP
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
April 12, 2008
The Constitutional Conspiracy:
Courts Colluding With White House
to Avoid Accountability
The proof is in. The federal courts have been found to be
co-conspirators with the Executive Branch in a collusive
scheme to avoid being held accountable to the Constitution
by the People.
There can
be no doubt. The federal judiciary is now being utilized as
an weapon
of oppression rather than for the ends of Justice for which
it was designed.
Not only has the Judiciary abandoned its role as an
independent arbiter of legal controversies involving injured
citizens seeking remediation for Government wrongs, the
Judiciary now refuses to even discuss the most basic,
underlying Founding Principles upon which our Republic
rests, i.e., the Rights of the People to Sovereignty and to
hold Government accountable -- particularly its obligation
to respond to Petitions for Redress of constitutional torts
as provided by the First Amendment.
The most egregious result of these developments is that not
only are the People effectively unable to secure Redress
against Government entities that have harmed them, but the
Judiciary has now abdicated its fundamental function under
the Constitution by refusing to interpret the Constitution
where questions of the Sovereignty of the People are
implicated. (continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
April 10, 2008

Schulz Goes to DC for April
15 Freedom Rally
Will Speak Following Rep. Ron Paul
WTP
Chairman Bob Schulz will speak at next Tuesday's Freedom
Rally in Washington DC.
The April 15th event features numerous individuals speaking
in defense of the Constitution, including presidential
candidate Rep. Ron Paul. It will take place on the grassy
protest area just off the west steps of the U.S. Capitol and
also feature live entertainment throughout the duration.
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
March
15, 2008

The Revolution
Continues...
Freedom Keeper Schedule Update
Click Here To Access
This Important Update
|
March 7,
2008
Schulz’s Plan Continues The
Revolution
Takes The Issues To The Next Level
Next Freedom Keeper Rallies: TX, AZ & MI
Responding to invitations from Ron Paul revolutionaries in
New England and Florida, WTP Chairman Bob Schulz
traveled to Concord, Massachusetts and Clearwater,
Florida the last two weekends to determine the level
of interest among the revolutionaries in a bold but
doable Plan for preserving and enhancing Freedom in
America.
At the end of his presentation, Bob asked the standing room
only audiences if they thought the Plan had the
potential of reversing America’s headlong rush
toward debt, dependency and decay, if the Plan was
sound enough for their participation and if Bob
should embark on a tour of the Country to promote
the Plan.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access
This Important Update
|
February
26, 2008
SCOTUS Says “NO”
What Must A Free People Do?
This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Tampa
Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ
Click Here To Access
This Important Update
|
February
23, 2008
NH Vote Recount Report by WTP
Optical Scan Machines Violate
Federal Law
Click here to
access the Update & full
Report
and supporting analysis.
|
February 17, 2008
This Friday, Feb. 22nd:
SCOTUS To Reconsider Landmark WTP v. US
Next Sunday: Schulz to Speak in MA
(continued...)
Click Here To Access
This Important Update
|
February
4, 2008
“SHAMEFUL AND TREASONOUS”
Petition for Rehearing Filed
in Landmark Right-to-Petition Case
Taking advantage of one final procedural step to ask
the U.S. Supreme
Court to hear the landmark Right to Petition case,
on February 1st
Bob Schulz filed a Petition for Rehearing.
“According to its own precedent, this Court would be
abdicating its duty and committing treason to the
Constitution if it fails to [accept jurisdiction
and hear this case]” wrote Schulz. “Tyranny marks a
government that
ignores its free People.”
Schulz also wrote that it would be “shameful” for
the Court to fail to hear this first impression
question of extreme public importance involving the
interpretation
of the Constitution while agreeing to hear the
probate/bankruptcy/defamation
case of Anna Nicole Smith.
“Shall the People in republican America, with its
written Constitution for the protection of the
public Rights and a body of strictly limited powers,
now be forbidden to do that which the Framers’
intended?” asked Schulz.
Click here for a copy of the
Petition for Rehearing.
RIGHT-Click here to download WTP's November, 2007
Petition for Writ of Certiorari
to the U.S. Supreme Court
and its
Appendix.
Please consider a
donation
to help finance
the work
of the WTP Foundation.
|
January
22, 2008
New Hampshire
Recount Underway
Join the
Live Interactive Video Forum!
As we
previously announced, following the discovery of large
statistical anomalies indicating possible evidence of voter
machine fraud, WTP is in New Hampshire to help
witness the recount of its primary ballots.
Live
Interactive Video Conferencing from NH
To
broadcast its recount coverage, WTP is making available a
state-of-the-art Internet video conferencing system so that
our supporters can be kept
abreast of the developments as
they unfold live.
We are currently scheduling several live breaking news
updates scheduled each day...
Witnesses
to the very first parts of the recount have already reported
broken ballot-box seals and recounts exposing significant
discrepancies
between the reported machine totals and the
recount totals.
We urge
everyone to help stand watch over the recount by subscribing
to WTP’s video Recount Forum.
Forum
participants will be able to have unlimited, LIVE
video/interactive access to the WTP Recount Forum for a
donation of only $15.
REMEMBER –
you must manually register
(STEP #2)
to
obtain your password after donating to the Congress.
Click here
to DONATE & REGISTER to join the forum:
http://forum.w4sp.com/
|
January 13, 2008
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari
for Landmark Right to Petition Case
Constitutional Crisis Escalating
Coming: Appropriate Next Steps
(continued...)
Click Here To Access
This Important Update
|
December 7, 2007
Update: WTP v. U.S.
Supreme Court Schedule Set
In the last Update, we reported the Supreme Court of the
United States assigned Docket Numbers to our Petition for
Writ of Certiorari (07-680 for the Petition by attorney Mark
Lane, and 07-681 for the Petition by Bob Schulz).
We also reported the Government then had the choice of filing
a Response to our Petition or a waiver of its right to file
a Response.
This week, the Government filed a WAIVER, surrendering its
right to file a Response to the Petitions.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
November 29, 2007
U.S. Supreme Court Dockets
Landmark Right to Petition Case
Two days ago, the U.S. Supreme Court docketed two
Petitions for Writ of
Certiorari arising from the same decision by the
United States Court of Appeals in the case titled,
We The People v. United States. The Supreme
Court will consider the two Petitions together.
One Petition for Writ of Certiorari, submitted by WTP
Chairman Robert Schulz, was assigned Docket Number
07-681. The second Petition for Writ of Certiorari,
filed by attorney
Mark Lane, who is representing the remaining
Plaintiffs, was assigned Docket Number 07-680.
By the end of the year we will know whether the nation's
Highest Court will take upon itself the burden of
considering -- for the first time in the
Republic's history -- the constitutional meaning
of the last ten words of the First Amendment, i.e.,
the People's Right to Petition the Government for a
Redress of Grievances.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
November 17, 2007
Items Of Interest
The Landmark
Right to Petition Lawsuit:
We The People v.
United States
The
“6700” Lawsuit:
United
States v. We The People
The NCEL
National Clean Election Lawsuit:
Full-Page Ad in
Washington Times
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
November 6, 2007
50
States Sued to Block
Computerized Vote Counting
Court to be Asked to Delay Primaries
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
October 24, 2007
Speaking to
Power
This week, the We The People organization Petitioned the
Judiciary of the
United States,
twice, on the Record, in what we believe is a historical,
intellectually compelling defense of the Constitution and
the People’s Right to hold the Government accountable to it.
Intense in degree and quality, an ardent, passionate prayer
for a Writ of Certiorari was filed in the Supreme Court of
the
United States in the landmark Right-to-Petition lawsuit,
We The People v. United States.
An equally forceful and cogent legal memorandum was filed in
the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
United States
v. We The People
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
Also in this update:
Year-End Fund Raiser Kicks Off:
2008 Freedom Calendars
Now Available!
|
October 2, 2007
"Clean Elections" Lawsuit
to Expand to All 50 States
More Plaintiffs Needed
Click Here
|
September 30
Media
Blackout:
161 Federal Tax Charges, 0 Convictions
IRS Suffers Staggering Defeat
Tax Questions Raised Regarding
Gold and Silver Coins Used to Pay Wages
Click Here
|
| September 23
Good News
On Two Fronts
Court Extends Stay Blocking U.S. Access
to WTP IDs
Click Here
|
September 21
WTP Initiates National
“Clean Elections” Lawsuit
Click Here
|
September 19
Second Circuit
Hears
Oral Arguments
Listen to the Hearing
Click Here
|
September 11
Media Noticing WTP’s
First Amendment Battle
at Second Circuit
Click Here
|
September 2
U.S. Court of
Appeals Orders
Oral Arguments For September 18th
Click Here
|
August 31
Dramatic
Development
U.S. Court of Appeals
Rules WTP
Does Not Have To Disclose
Identities of
Supporters
Click Here
|
|
| |
August 25, 2007
Sleightful
Once again, our servant federal Government has employed an
indirect, ingenious, and most cunning means to achieve a
nefarious end.
Whether the end is a justification for an immoral war against
Iraq
or a war against the Right to Petition and accountability,
it makes no difference to the Government – the ends justify
the means.
Doubtless, from the White House to the Government’s lawyers
and tax collectors, we have a clever bunch of tyrants
treading on us.
Here’s a clue to the latest factual chapter in the continuing
epic tale about WTP and the Right to Petition, which we
present to you below:
"WMD"
is to the war against Iraq
as WTP’s "Blue Folder" is
to the war against the Right to Petition
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
Don't miss this important update about WTP's fight
against the IRS "6700" lawsuit!
|
| |
August 15, 2007
WTP Takes Action Against Vote Fraud
Diebold
Vote Machines Fail In Iowa
Last
Thursday, two days before the August 11th presidential Iowa
Straw Poll, Bob Schulz and seven other Plaintiffs filed suit
in federal court in Des Moines, Iowa seeking to permanently
prohibit the state of Iowa from conducting any Straw Poll,
Caucus, Primary, Special or General Election unless the
voting and vote counting was open, verifiable, machine-free,
and computer-free.
Upon
filing the suit, the Plaintiffs formally asked the Court for
emergency injunctive relief, i.e., to order state election
officials to modify the voting procedures for the Iowa Straw
Poll to insure the validity of the voting process.
Specifically, the desired order sought to eliminate the use
of Diebold voting machines that had been officially
decertified by the state of California on August 3rd, to
assure that the ballots were never out of public view, to
force state election officials to publicly hand-count the
ballots at each voting station and to announce the results
and to conduct the tabulation of the vote station subtotals
under full public observation.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
August 5, 2007
Protecting Ron Paul, the Rest
of the “2nd Tier” and America
Citizen
Vigilance Essential
As things stand today, about 60
citizen camera crews and about 200 citizen volunteers are
needed to conduct a “citizens’ exit poll” to double check
the easily rigged Diebold electronic voting machines which
the Iowa GOP intends to use to “count” the vote at the Ames,
Iowa Straw Poll on August 11, 2007 – just a week from now.
If you can possibly attend
and/or donate to help with this “citizens’ exit poll” – see
the action items at the end of this update – but first:
Picture this:
Next Saturday, from 10 am to 6
pm, more than 25,000 residents of the State of Iowa will
arrive on the campus of Iowa State University in Ames. They
will be 18 years of age or older. They will be there to
choose one man from a list of eleven men as their choice to
be the next President of the United States of America.
At one of 60 vote stations they
will receive a paper ballot. They will pencil in an oval
next to the candidate of their choice. They will enter the
paper ballot into a machine that will scan the entire ballot
and record the vote. After voting, each voter will place a
thumb into a container of purple ink.
After scanning each ballot the machine will deposit the
ballot into a “black box” within the Diebold machine. At 6
pm each machine and black box are transported to a
centralized “tabulation” room. The door to the room will
be closed to the public.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
July 19, 2007
(Article Deleted)
This material
has been deleted pursuant
to a US District Court Order. It will be Appealed.
|
| |
June 24, 2007
Read It
Twice:
En Banc Request Filed in DC
Day of
Prayer and Fasting: July 1st
On Friday,
June 22, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit received the original and
nineteen copies of the People’s Petition for En Banc
consideration in the case We The People v. United States,
Case No 05-5359.
A link to the People’s Petition is located at the end of
this article. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ IT TWICE to absorb the
finer points or if you don’t understand a word or concept.
The future of the great American experiment in
self-government hangs in the balance. To use the vernacular,
“It’s crunch time.” This is the second highest Court in the
land.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
June 4, 2007
Epic Unfolding
Constitution v. Law
What
started in 1999 as a straightforward, honest effort to help
Joe Banister obtain answers from the IRS to his petition
regarding the alleged fraudulent origin and illegal
operation and enforcement of the federal income tax system,
has taken on the nature of an epic, characterized by events
of historical, legendary and exceptional importance.
Our epic is
about nothing less than the Right of the People to hold the
Government accountable to the Constitution by claiming and
exercising the capstone Right guaranteed by the First
Amendment: “Congress shall make no law…abridging…the right
of the people…to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
Our epic is
about the deeds of modern heroic Freedom Keepers, expressing
the ideals, character, and traditions Free Men experienced
during the first years of our nation, in their exercise of
their Right to Petition for Redress of constitutional
torts.
Our epic is
unfolding against a background of warfare between the
Constitution and unconstitutional acts of Government
that violate the tax, war, money and privacy clauses of the
Constitution.
Our epic
includes men of strong heart and character, unafraid to
confront those that would seek to deny them their Liberty,
and lesser souls as well, either too enamored with power or
rapt with fear to proudly proclaim the self-evident truths
and Principles of Nature that beckoned the dawn of the
Republic.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
May 7, 2007
9/11: Why They Attacked Us
Bin Laden: In His Own Words
WTP: Petition For
Redress
Please
sit and take a deep breath, or even two, before you begin
reading this article.
Sometimes the truth can hurt -- a lot. This may be one of
those times. It was for us.
Before continuing, please remember: we are only the
messengers; we deal with facts, not opinions; the Country
and the Government are two separate things; we will forever
love our Country and be willing to give our lives in defense
of its system of governance – as designed and set forth
in our founding document – but, we should always
distrust the Government; we avoid all political questions;
we seek only to hold those in Government accountable to
Truth, Justice and the Constitution, regardless of their
political stripes; we have confronted Democrat and
Republican administrations with equal fervor.
The last few months have been difficult ones for us. We have
gone through an uncomfortable paradigm shift in our
understanding of how our government has become unaccountable
to the People and in coming to grips with the incredible
risks our beloved Republic now faces.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
April 15, 2007
Who and What is “Israel”?
(excerpt...)
Last week
we received yet another batch of e-mails in response to our
recent articles regarding the question of US foreign policy
and the Constitutional violations that result from that
policy. One email consisted of no message but a simple terse
subject line that read simply, “We Are Israel.”
At the time, we had no idea what was meant by those three
words. Now we do.
It has come
to pass that the meaning of two of the most important words
in America’s vocabulary -- “Income” and “Israel” -- appear
to have been hijacked for nefarious ends.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
|
| |
April 10, 2007
Israel Lobby
& U.S. Foreign Policy:
Apartheid and Manipulation
In our
March 18, 2007 article we raised the question of whether
U.S. Middle East policy was repugnant to the General Welfare
Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Specifically, we presented several questions that we
believed needed to be answered: “What if the fundamental
Rights, Liberties and Freedoms of Americans were being
curtailed because the United States was becoming a police
State? What if the
United States
was becoming a Police State because it was engaged in
a War on Terror?
What if the War on Terror was a result of hostilities
directed towards the United States because the United States
was annually giving billions of dollars of its tax
revenues to the Government of Israel, who was using that
money to pay its military to seize and occupy territories
belonging to Palestinians -- a people of a different
ethnicity and religion -- and to support the tyranny of
Apartheid and Ethnic Cleansing against the Palestinians?
On April 7,
2007 we reported that we had received a number of sharp and
caustic emails following the announcement that we would
openly and objectively discuss the constitutionality of
America’s financial and military support of Israel, the role
that America has played directly and indirectly in the
destruction of Palestine society, the “War on Terror” that
has consumed our nation, and the developing Police State and
erosion of individual Liberty and the rule of Law here at
home.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
April 7, 2007
U.S., Israel and AIPAC: “No, Thank You”
Palestine: “Yes, Thank You”
On March
18th we posted an article titled “Mid-East Policy
vs. the U.S. Constitution” in which we said we were inviting
representatives of the Israel Lobby (AIPAC) and the
Governments of the United States, Israel and Palestine to
attend GML 2007 to comment on the accuracy of a recent paper
published by Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt,
entitled, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” and a
book published recently by Jimmy Carter entitled, “Palestine
Peace Not Apartheid.”
We wrote
that according to Mearsheimer, Walt and Carter, the United
States has abandoned its own national interest and security
to advance the interests of Israel, that neither strategic
nor moral arguments can justify America’s unconditional
support for Israel, that the United States has become the de
facto enabler of Israel’s unlawful expansion and military
occupation of the Palestinian Territories, that the United
States is paying for the destruction of the Palestinian
society, that U.S. policy in the Middle East (including
giving Israel well over $140 billion in U.S. income tax
revenues) has been driven by the activities of the “Israel
Lobby,” and that the Israel Lobby attacks any person or
organization that criticizes or is perceived to be a threat
to Israel’s interests.
We wrote
that if, in fact, the information presented by the
Professors and Carter was correct, it must be concluded
that U.S. Foreign Policy is repugnant to the General
Welfare clause of the Constitution.
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
April 4, 2007
Right-to-Petition “V” Protest
at
White House Garners Notice
Washington
Post Gets It Right
|
| |
March 23, 2007
Income Tax Panel Added
to GML 2007
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
March 22, 2007
Israel Lobby Targets
Tax Honesty Movement
Are Kidd, Becraft, Banister
and Schulz “Extremists”?
(continued...)
Click Here To Access the Full Update
|
| |
March 18, 2007
Mid-East Policy v. the U.S.
Constitution:
GML 2007 to Debate Divisive Question
Petitions Served on
Government
| | |